A man named Kirtsaeng has recently made news in the writing
community thanks to Scott Turrow—president of the authors guild and fiction
author—complaining about him to the point that the New York Times interviewed
him and printed the report as ‘The death of the American Author.’
Shame on the New York Times, which is supposed to give
actual insight into developments and give the whole story instead of just
stopping at the interview. Instead, the
site techdirt, giving the low down on mostly news stories and even purely how
they relate to tech-based jobs, gave the whole story, going, gar, far beyond
the duty of a cross-country news site.
For those who read neither article (don’t blame you), a man
named Kirtsaeng made thousands by selling textbooks on ebay. While prices are artificially inflated here
in America , they aren’t in Thailand , the land of Kirtsaeng ’s
parents. Everything was done legally, yet Scott claims this is the work of
piracy and anything that allows it should be shut down.
Authors back Scott with his ridiculous fight against resale
stores, only making people wonder what planet they think they’re on and a good
argument to stray away from the book market until it learns what a market is
and how it works. Only a few seem to be cluing in to what the implications of
Scott's words.
Both sides have already been reported on, he side I feel
needs far more attention is that Kirtsaeng’s actions should be lauded and
should have brought to light a problem that has needed to be addressed since
the economic crash. For the last year,
student loan debt has been speculated to slowing down recovery to destroyingthe economic prospects of an entire generation.
Textbook prices are a contributor.
How is Kirtsaeng not seen as a hero? Especially by those who already know the
hardship of struggling to pay for classes, study for and pass them, juggle jobs
and chores, and hope to have time and money to spend on food, housing, and
emergencies? Every author who backs
Scott should be asked: why are you punishing those in college? Why are you not satisfied with royalties, but
need pumped up royalties paid by a struggling demographic?
If only the guild had stood for gouging neither party for
money. I truly wish this were a black
mark that would remain upon the guild’s reputation until they actively worked
to redeem themselves from such a view.
It is a dark day to the an author, thanks to guilt by
association.
No comments:
Post a Comment